Monday, May 24, 2010

Treatment of Class

Madame Bovary, Emma, the protagonist of the novel, belongs to a middle class bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie at the time that the book was written is the similar to the middle-class now-a-days: they don't have any rich family that left something behind to them, however they have a job that doesn't require that much laboring. Emma always wishes to change her status in the social class, however her attempts always fails. Her lover Rodolphe is an example of this; he is a wealthy landowner, and took Emma to the parties where all wealthy people were, and she was always astonished by everything, however she tried to act as if she belonged to that class but most of the times did shameful actions. The social class of people that Emma visits in the end of the book is also compromising with the fact of her social class. She visits a nurse who is poor and is from the lower class, and afterwards the rich and wealthy lawyer, that had a big house and had everthing that she dreamed of. These change in scenarios proves that Emma belongs to her middle class. Emma is consistently judging her husband because of not being wealthy, and not having the conditions that she dreamed, and seeks in her lover this opportunity to jump to another social class.

The downfall of Emma was also interesting considering the fact that Flaubert criticized the bourgeoisie. Emma practically get over because of loaning money, and having expensive materials to feel as a higher class person. She is always attending theatres and having piano lessons, and wating money with her lovers. Emma is totally dependent on money and her downfall in the book is mostly because of her trying to be someone she couldn't.

Flaubert obviously criticized this class, and he introduces Homais, who led Charles into being a doctor so the reader is able to see his flaws, and he belonged to this middle class. Homais also have long speeches, trying to prove something about being a doctor that he himself did not no. Homais leads people to believe what he says as a result of his long speeches, and this is the characteristic that Flaubert criticizes. When Emma is dying because of the poison, Homais tries to show some knowledge about what to do and says that the smart thing to do was to find the antidote for the poison, and when they go to a real the doctor the guy only says that he should've had stuck his finger inside her mouth. In the end of this book, however, Homais gets rewarded with a medal, while Charles that was a very sincere person and the one that deserved it was dead. This shows that sometimes these people with pretentious display of knowledge win the ones who understands more and are more capable of doing better work.

2 comments:

  1. Well done, and although your last sentence is a little confusing I think I get the meaning. Homais is quite corrupt, and I wonder if Flaubert is also criticizing those who think life in the upper and middle classes is somehow better than the working class. Emma, of course, in her pursuit for a better (more wealthy life filled with romance) is certainly evidence of this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The portrayal of class in Wuthering Heights and Madame Bovary uses different paths to get to similar criticisms. Emma, in Madame Bovary, is of the middle class, and has a very different life style compared to the aristocracy she aspires to be a part of, while in Wuthering Heights, both of the main families are "farm gentry", and all live in "good conditions". The characters in Wuthering Heights, with the exception of the servants and Hareton, don’t do any sort of time-taking work (Heathcliff sometimes leaves to look over things), which appears to be an important part of Emma’s husband’s life. Even taking this into account, a similar behavior can be seen by Catherine, who has to pick between Heathcliff and Edgar, and decides for the social ascension.
    Concerning social class, Rudolph's situation seems parallel to Edgars- in both stories this plays a major role in the unraveling of the plot. They are both chosen as a direct result of their financial situation and of the mentality of the society at that time. In Wuthering Heights, it is this that fuels Heathcliff’s anger enabling all the other happenings to take place.
    The criticism of the bourgeoisie’s behavior seems more obvious in Madame Bovary than it is in Wuthering Heights. In both novels, the notion of aspiring to be of a higher class one does not belong too is shown to lead to more confusion and problems. However, the criticism seems to be more concentrated to the bourgeoisie in Madame Bovary, while in Wuthering Heights, the criticisms also involve the jealousy of the higher class (everyone just wants more money). Also, it appears that both novels criticize the changing of social classes: in Madame Bovary, Emma does not fit in with the aristocracy and makes “a fool of herself”, while in Wuthering Heights Heathcliff has to undermine others (such as Hareton- not allowing him to get an education) in order to make himself feel more important.
    by- Bruna

    ReplyDelete